The trend, up until recently I think, has been against religion. The science has undercut, particularly Darwinism has very much undercut traditional religion. I think that's likely to change, I think the whole Darwinian view, although there are many things about it of course that are quite legitimate. Well, put it this way, in the 19th century you had Marx, Freud and Darwin as the three big deterministic thinkers. I think Marx is pretty well dead, Freud is considered pseudo-science now, Darwin is still riding high. Everyone thinks Darwin is, but I think Darwin is the third determinist, which will eventually come under criticism. Not for the idea that human beings are kin to other species. No. I mean, we're all creatures, that's even consistent with Orthodox Christianity, if well understood. But, the idea among the Neo-Darwinists is that everything is the result of chance: random mutation, natural selection according to random changes in the environment. If everything is reducible to chance, then you've undercut the reason to do most anything. And I think some scientists have been very, very slow to understand the nihilistic implications of their theory at a broader social level. So I think that's going to come under attack and people are going to start thinking more clearly and critically about some of the scientific dogma that they've accepted too easily.